I wouldn't have thought it possible for them to so change their minds, not after they made it clear that the absence of WMD in Iraq made no difference to the merits of the war, in their minds, but here it is... the Economist has endorsed Kerry.
It is a strong measure of how far Bush has fallen, post-9/11 and post-Afghanistan. To the magazine's credit, they cite Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib as primary reasons for witholding their support from the President. Nonetheless, one cannot help but feel that the butchered corpse this Administration has made of Iraq is really the critical factor here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment