Or something like that. I dunno, it sounded to me like the judge said that the arguments the litigants brought -- that marriage isn't required for procreation, and so there's no good reason to keep a traditional, if unconstitutional, ban on gay marriage.
Most interestingly, Santorum argues this supports the need for an amendment to the US Constitution. Else, it seems, Kansans will be forced to have man-man sex. Or something like that.
Tuesday, March 15, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment